Today review count: 5.

Request early access

Today

Finish the check-ins that need a decision—without opening every sheet.

SN

Sophie Nguyen

1 decision to review

Moderate evidenceHistorical evidence · last data 6 Jul 2026

No newer comparable evidence available

Decision to make

Weight is flat and execution is down. Check execution before changing the plan.

At a glance

  • Weekly average body weight

    <0.1%Decreased

    Compared with 72 kg · 8 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026

Decisive evidence

  1. Nutrition adherence

    Latest 75% · 6 Jul 2026 · 3 observations

    Nutrition adherence remained level across 3 observations from 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026.remained level · 3 observations

  2. Step target

    Latest 10,000 steps/day · 6 Jul 2026 · 3 observations

    Step target remained level across 3 observations from 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026.remained level · 3 observations

  3. Recorded steps

    Latest 6,500 steps/day · 6 Jul 2026 · 3 observations

    Recorded steps remained level across 3 observations from 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026.remained level · 3 observations

  4. Weekly average body weight

    Latest 72 kg · 6 Jul 2026 · 5 observations

    Weekly average body weight remained level across 5 observations from 8 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026.remained level · 5 observations
    Recent average
    72.01 kg
    Comparison average
    72.03 kg
    Change between periods
    -0.02 kg
    Percentage difference
    0.03% below comparison average
Relevant context

  1. Programme phase

    15 Jun 2026 · 1 observation

    Current stateFat-loss phaseSnapshot · no trend implied
Relevant client context · Programme phase
Fat-loss phase · supported as of 15 Jun 2026
Decision context

What changed

As of 2026-07-06, the evidence showed: weight has stayed flat for three weeks while steps or recorded adherence have also been lower.

Priority reason: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a newly detected change.

What the evidence can’t confirm

The available records may no longer reflect the client’s current position. Check source status before assuming a check-in is missing. Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.

Possible next step

Review the recent execution pattern before deciding whether the flat scale trend reflects the plan.

Coach decision

Choose the next step for this sample. Nothing is saved to a client’s review history.

Check-in draft available

Choose one coach decision
More decision optionsKeep the plan or gather context
Decide later (Snooze this decision)

Returns 21 Nov 2026.

More
Evidence details

5 compatible series · 15 retained observations · Coverage: complete

Caveat: Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.

Inspect exact evidence

  1. Nutrition adherence

    3 source cells · 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · ratio

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: 75%

    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A12Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A16Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A20Recorded sourceSource link unavailable

  2. Programme phase

    1 source cell · 15 Jun 2026

    Coach-set target

    Latest: Fat-loss phase

    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A2Supporting contextSource link unavailable

  3. Step target

    3 source cells · 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · steps/day

    Coach-set target

    Latest: 10,000 steps/day

    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A13Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A17Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A21Recorded sourceSource link unavailable

  4. Recorded steps

    3 source cells · 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · steps/day

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: 6,500 steps/day

    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A14Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A18Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A22Recorded sourceSource link unavailable

  5. Weekly average body weight

    5 source cells · 8 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · kg

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: 72 kg

    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A3Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A7Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A11Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A15Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Sophie Nguyen — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A19Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
Decision record & follow-through

Evidence checked

The required evidence for this review was available. Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.

Why this is ranked here

Priority #1: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a newly detected change.

Decision impact
37/40
Recency
17/20
Evidence strength
16/20
Novelty
20/20
Ranking context
New work · Evidence is aging

What Vordian did

Fixed, reviewable rules connected the cited evidence and set the priority; no AI model changed it. Vordian prepared this review only; it did not contact the client or change their plan.

Review history

  1. 15 Jul 2026 · Review prepared
Ask examples