Today review count: 5.

Today

Finish the check-ins that need a decision—without opening every sheet.

GL

Grace Lee

1 decision to review

Moderate evidenceHistorical evidence · last data 6 Jul 2026

No newer comparable evidence available

Decision to make

Activity and recovery are down together. Check in with the client?

At a glance

  • Recorded steps

    11.7%Decreased

    Compared with 10,000 steps/day · 1 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026

  • Sleep score

    12.1%Worsened

    Compared with 8 out of 10 · 1 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026

  • Fatigue or recovery score

    13%Worsened

    Compared with 8 out of 10 · 1 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026

Decisive evidence

  1. Fatigue or recovery score

    Latest 6.8 out of 10 · 6 Jul 2026 · 6 observations

    Fatigue or recovery score decreased across 6 observations from 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026.decreased · 6 observations
    Recent average
    6.93 out of 10
    Comparison average
    7.97 out of 10
    Change between periods
    -1.03 points
    Percentage difference
    12.97% below comparison average
  2. Sleep score

    Latest 6.9 out of 10 · 6 Jul 2026 · 6 observations

    Sleep score decreased across 6 observations from 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026.decreased · 6 observations
    Recent average
    7.03 out of 10
    Comparison average
    8 out of 10
    Change between periods
    -0.97 points
    Percentage difference
    12.08% below comparison average
  3. Recorded steps

    Latest 8,700 steps/day · 6 Jul 2026 · 6 observations

    Recorded steps decreased across 6 observations from 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026.decreased · 6 observations
    Recent average
    8,833.33 steps/day
    Comparison average
    10,000 steps/day
    Change between periods
    -1,166.67 steps/day
    Percentage difference
    11.67% below comparison average
Decision context

What changed

As of 2026-07-06, the evidence showed: steps, sleep and recovery declined together across the latest three weeks.

Priority reason: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a newly detected change.

What the evidence can’t confirm

The available records may no longer reflect the client’s current position. Check source status before assuming a check-in is missing. Independent connected sources outside these aligned fields are not included.

Possible next step

Review the activity and recovery changes together, then decide whether a client check-in would help.

Coach decision

Choose the next step for this sample. Nothing is saved to a client’s review history.

Check-in draft available

Choose one coach decision
More decision optionsKeep the plan or gather context
Decide later (Snooze this decision)

Returns 22 Nov 2026.

More
Evidence details

3 compatible series · 18 retained observations · Coverage: complete

Caveat: Independent connected sources outside these aligned fields are not included.

Inspect exact evidence

  1. Fatigue or recovery score

    6 source cells · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · 0–10 scale

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: 6.8 out of 10

    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A4Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A7Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A10Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A13Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A16Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A19Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
  2. Sleep score

    6 source cells · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · 0–10 scale

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: 6.9 out of 10

    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A3Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A6Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A9Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A12Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A15Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A18Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
  3. Recorded steps

    6 source cells · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · steps/day

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: 8,700 steps/day

    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A2Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A5Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A8Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A11Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A14Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Grace Lee — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A17Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
Decision record & follow-through

Evidence checked

The required evidence for this review was available. Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.

Why this is ranked here

Priority #1: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a newly detected change.

Decision impact
38/40
Recency
17/20
Evidence strength
16/20
Novelty
20/20
Ranking context
New work · Evidence is aging

What Vordian did

Fixed, reviewable rules connected the cited evidence and set the priority; no AI model changed it. Vordian prepared this review only; it did not contact the client or change their plan.

Review history

  1. 15 Jul 2026 · Review prepared
Ask examples