Priya Shah
1 decision to review
No newer comparable evidence available
Decision to make
Sleep and fatigue have worsened. Ask what changed before adjusting the plan.
At a glance
Nutrition adherence
0%Unchanged
Compared with 94% · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026
Sleep score
144.4%Worsened
Compared with 0.9 out of 5 · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026
Fatigue or recovery score
125.9%Worsened
Compared with 0.9 out of 5 · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026
Decisive evidence
Fatigue or recovery score
Latest 2.6 out of 5 · 6 Jul 2026 · 6 observations
increased · 6 observations- Recent average
- 2.03 out of 5
- Comparison average
- 0.9 out of 5
- Change between periods
- +1.13 points
- Percentage difference
- 125.93% above comparison average
Nutrition adherence
Latest 94% · 6 Jul 2026 · 6 observations
remained level · 6 observations- Recent average
- 94%
- Comparison average
- 94%
- Change between periods
- 0 percentage points
- Percentage difference
- 0% difference
Sleep score
Latest 2.8 out of 5 · 6 Jul 2026 · 6 observations
increased · 6 observations- Recent average
- 2.2 out of 5
- Comparison average
- 0.9 out of 5
- Change between periods
- +1.3 points
- Percentage difference
- 144.44% above comparison average
Decision context
What changed
As of 2026-07-06, the evidence showed: sleep issues and fatigue have both trended up across the last three weekly check-ins compared with the previous three.
Priority reason: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a newly detected change.
What the evidence can’t confirm
The available records may no longer reflect the client’s current position. Check source status before assuming a check-in is missing. Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.
Possible next step
Review the last three check-ins and ask about sleep, training load and day-to-day stress before deciding whether the plan needs adjusting.
Coach decision
Choose the next step for this sample. Nothing is saved to a client’s review history.
Check-in draft available
Decide later (Snooze this decision)
Returns 22 Nov 2026.
More
Evidence details
3 compatible series · 18 retained observations · Coverage: complete
Caveat: Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.
Inspect exact evidence
- Recorded actuals
Fatigue or recovery score
6 source cells · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · 0–5 scale
Latest: 2.6 out of 5
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A3Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A6Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A9Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A12Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A15Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A18Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Recorded actuals
Nutrition adherence
6 source cells · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · ratio
Latest: 94%
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A4Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A7Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A10Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A13Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A16Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A19Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Recorded actuals
Sleep score
6 source cells · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · 0–5 scale
Latest: 2.8 out of 5
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A2Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A5Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A8Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A11Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A14Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Priya Shah — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A17Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
Decision record & follow-through
Evidence checked
The required evidence for this review was available. Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.
Why this is ranked here
Priority #1: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a newly detected change.
- Decision impact
- 36/40
- Recency
- 17/20
- Evidence strength
- 20/20
- Novelty
- 16/20
- Ranking context
- New work · Evidence is aging
What Vordian did
Fixed, reviewable rules connected the cited evidence and set the priority; no AI model changed it. Vordian prepared this review only; it did not contact the client or change their plan.
Review history
- 15 Jul 2026 · Review prepared