Marcus Vance
1 decision to review
No newer comparable evidence available
Decision to make
Marcus Vance’s weight gain is faster than planned. Is 0.20 kg/week still right for this phase?
At a glance
Weekly average body weight
1.3%Increased
Compared with 90.3 kg · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026
Target weight change rate
0%Unchanged
Compared with 0.2 kg/week · 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026
Decisive evidence
Target weight-change rate
Latest 0.2 kg/week · 6 Jul 2026 · 3 observations
remained level · 3 observationsWeekly average body weight
Latest 91.9 kg · 6 Jul 2026 · 6 observations
increased · 6 observations- Observed
- 0.4 kg/week
- Target
- 0.2 kg/week
- Difference (observed − target)
- +0.2 kg/week
- Percentage difference
- 100% faster than target
Relevant context
Programme phase
6 Jul 2026 · 3 observations
Current stateOff-season gainSnapshot · no trend implied
- Relevant client context · Programme phase
- Off-season gain · supported as of 6 Jul 2026
Decision context
What changed
As of 2026-07-06, the evidence showed: weight gain is faster than planned. Latest 3 weeks: 0.40 kg/week versus 0.20 kg/week target, about 100% faster (0.20 kg/week).
Priority reason: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a supported new review.
What the evidence can’t confirm
The available records may no longer reflect the client’s current position. Check source status before assuming a check-in is missing. The connected Sheet cannot establish safety, diagnosis, or a required plan change.
Possible next step
Check in with Marcus Vance to confirm the 0.20 kg/week target still fits this phase.
Coach decision
Choose the next step for this sample. Nothing is saved to a client’s review history.
Check-in draft available
Decide later (Snooze this decision)
Returns 22 Nov 2026.
More
Evidence details
3 compatible series · 12 retained observations · Coverage: complete
Caveat: The connected Sheet cannot establish safety, diagnosis, or a required plan change.
Inspect exact evidence
- Coach-set target
Programme phase
3 source cells · 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026
Latest: Off-season gain
- Marcus Vance — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A8Supporting contextSource link unavailable
- Marcus Vance — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A10Supporting contextSource link unavailable
- Marcus Vance — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A12Supporting contextSource link unavailable
- Coach-set target
Target weight-change rate
3 source cells · 22 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · kg/week
Latest: 0.2 kg/week
- Marcus Vance — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A9Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Marcus Vance — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A11Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Marcus Vance — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A13Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
- Recorded actuals
Weekly average body weight
6 source cells · 1 Jun 2026–6 Jul 2026 · kg
Latest: 91.9 kg
- Marcus Vance — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycells A2:A7Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
Decision record & follow-through
Evidence checked
The required evidence for this review was available. Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.
Why this is ranked here
Priority #1: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, cited evidence that is aging, and a supported new review.
- Decision impact
- 34/40
- Recency
- 16/20
- Evidence strength
- 20/20
- Novelty
- 13/20
- Ranking context
- New work · Evidence is aging
What Vordian did
Fixed, reviewable rules connected the cited evidence and set the priority; no AI model changed it. Vordian prepared this review only; it did not contact the client or change their plan.
Review history
- 15 Jul 2026 · Review prepared