Today review count: 5.

Today

Finish the check-ins that need a decision—without opening every sheet.

NR

Noah Reed

1 decision to review

Strong evidenceData checked through 12 Jul 2026

Decision to make

Recorded intake is below target. Check adherence barriers before changing calories.

At a glance

  • Recorded calories

    0.2%Increased

    Compared with 1,697.1 kcal/day · 29 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026

  • Calorie target

    0%Unchanged

    Compared with 2,100 kcal/day · 29 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026

Decisive evidence

  1. Recorded calories

    Latest 1,700 kcal/day · 12 Jul 2026 · 14 observations

    Recorded calories increased across 14 observations from 29 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026.increased · 14 observations
    Observed
    1,698.57 kcal/day
    Target
    2,100 kcal/day
    Difference (observed − target)
    -401.43 kcal/day
    Percentage difference
    19.12% below target
  2. Calorie target

    Latest 2,100 kcal/day · 12 Jul 2026 · 14 observations

    Calorie target remained level across 14 observations from 29 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026.remained level · 14 observations
Relevant context
  1. Decision context

    10 Jul 2026 · 1 observation

    Current stateReview low appetite and missed meals before changing the target.Snapshot · no trend implied
Decision context

What changed

Recorded intake has stayed below the current calorie target for the past two weeks.

Priority reason: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, current cited evidence, and a newly detected change.

What the evidence can’t confirm

Unconnected meals, messages, and appetite context remain outside this conclusion.

Possible next step

Review adherence barriers and current context before considering any target change.

Coach decision

Choose the next step for this sample. Nothing is saved to a client’s review history.

Check-in draft available

Choose one coach decision
More decision optionsKeep the plan or gather context
Decide later (Snooze this decision)

Returns 22 Nov 2026.

More
Evidence details

3 compatible series · 29 retained observations · Coverage: complete

Caveat: Unconnected meals, messages, and appetite context remain outside this conclusion.

Inspect exact evidence

  1. Recorded calories

    14 source cells · 29 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026 · kcal/day

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: 1,700 kcal/day

    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A3Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A5Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A7Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A9Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A11Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A13Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A15Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A17Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A19Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A21Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A23Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A25Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A27Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A29Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
  2. Calorie target

    14 source cells · 29 Jun 2026–12 Jul 2026 · kcal/day

    Coach-set target

    Latest: 2,100 kcal/day

    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A2Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A4Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A6Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A8Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A10Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A12Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A14Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A16Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A18Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A20Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A22Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A24Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A26Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A28Recorded sourceSource link unavailable
  3. Decision context

    1 source cell · 10 Jul 2026

    Recorded actuals

    Latest: Review low appetite and missed meals before changing the target.

    • Noah Reed — Weekly check-insCheck-in historycell A30Supporting contextSource link unavailable
Decision record & follow-through

Evidence checked

The required evidence for this review was available. Synthetic demo evidence; no real client data is present.

Why this is ranked here

Priority #1: Its position reflects a material coaching decision, current cited evidence, and a newly detected change.

Decision impact
35/40
Recency
18/20
Evidence strength
20/20
Novelty
15/20
Ranking context
New work · Evidence is current

What Vordian did

Fixed, reviewable rules connected the cited evidence and set the priority; no AI model changed it. Vordian prepared this review only; it did not contact the client or change their plan.

Review history

  1. 15 Jul 2026 · Review prepared
Ask examples